"​No gathbandhan, it is non-bandhan," says Arun Jaitley calling the grand alliance a 'chaos' with an agenda

Continuing his series of blog, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has in his recent one suggested that the 'Mahagathbandhan' is not a force to reckon in the upcoming Lok Sabha 2019 polls, given in a number of states, parties that are part of the grand alliance will be fighting against each other.

Using the examples of states like Delhi, Haryana, J&K, West Bengal, the senior BJP leader has cited the non-willingness of those parties to work together to come to a conclusion that all the hue and cry is only to 'remove one man'. 

Over the last several months, India was exhausted with the talk of a ‘Mahagathbandhan’. The rationale was that Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and the BJP were very strong and could not be challenged by individual party. The socio-economic profile of India has changed. Indians judge politicians by their merit and capacity and no longer by any traditional loyalty. We were promised a ‘coalition of rivals’ because India had to be saved. We were promised a common minimum agenda. Each leader amongst the aspirant Prime Ministers wanted to become a ‘sutradhar’ of the alliance. He/ she would periodically organise shows in his/ her State and invite the entire bandwagon.

​Presently when nominations for the first two phases are over and those for the third phase are about to happen, let us review the situation.

The above states account for almost half of the total parliamentary constituencies. In the other half, stretching from Maharashtra to Punjab, which includes Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Gujarat, the political winds are not exactly friendly to the Congress.

The leadership tussle

​Already multiple candidates have made their desire clear to take over the mantle of the leadership. Each one of them is interested to see the strength of the other party’s contender depleting. Each one of them has high hopes in a chaotic and highly hung Parliament. He/ she believes that only in a chaotic situation he/ she has a chance.

​The past track record of such governments in terms of policy, longevity and growth has to be borne in mind. Their track record of corruption is equally well-known.

Federalism and coalitions

​Federalism requires that regional aspirations and representations find place in governance. But a larger national interest requires that India must have a national party with an electoral and legislative base which can become nucleus of such a coalition. The coalition under Late Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee was held by both the personality of the leader and the 183 MPs of the BJP. Similarly, the BJP had an absolute majority in the last Lok Sabha but it still formed a coalition. It is only because of the size of the BJP and clarity on leadership in the last coalition that a successful government was run under Prime Minister Modi.

​Today you have no ‘gathbandhan’ let alone ‘mahagathbandhan’. It is a ‘non-bandhan’. You have no leader, no programme, no meeting of minds. Stability, which is paramount, is a major casualty. The only thing in common is negative agenda ‘’remove one man’. It is a recipe for chaos.