Ayodhya Verdict: 'Matter shouldn't be stretched' says Jama Masjid Imam

Accepting the Supreme Court verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case, the Shahi Imam of the Jama Masjid in Delhi, Syed Ahmed Bukhari, said on Saturday the matter should not be stretched further. He said Muslims in the country want peace and they had already said that they would accept whatever judgment the apex court delivers. The Supreme Court in a unanimous verdict on Saturday cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

Syed Ahmed Bukhari on Ayodhya verdict

"We accept the court order and the Hindu-Muslim issue which had been going on for several years should come to an end now," Bukhari said in a press conference. Asked about the possibility of a review petition being filed against the verdict, he said the matter should not be stretched. "Muslims of India want peace in the country. Before the court's order, all Muslims had said that they would accept the court's order, whatever it be," the Imam said.

Read: No effect on IFFI of Goa prohibitory orders for Ayodhya verdict

Mosque to be built on a 'prominent site'

In one of the most important and most anticipated judgements in India's history, a 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi put an end to the more than a century-old dispute that has torn the social fabric of the nation. The apex court said the mosque should be constructed at a "prominent site", allotted either by the Centre or the Uttar Pradesh government. Apart from this, they ruled that a trust should be formed within three months for the construction of the temple at the site many Hindus believe Lord Ram was born.

Read: Ayodhya verdict: Here's what the Allahabad High Court held in 2010

The site was occupied by the 16th-century Babri mosque, built by the Mughal empire's founder Babur, which was destroyed by Hindu kar sevaks on December 6, 1992. The verdict was pronounced on 14 appeals filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally. It was to be partitioned among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and 'Ram Lalla'. 

Read: Ayodhya Verdict: Disputed land to be given to Hindus, holds SC

Read: Ayodhya Verdict: Hindu Mahasabha lawyer's exclusive to Republic TV