Madras HC Lawyers Protest Over Decision To Transfer CJ Tahilramani

General News

Madras HC bar members protest outside the HC at the collegium's decision to transfer Madras CJ Tahilramani. They claim the decision is arbitrary and obscure

Written By Akriti Tyagi | Mumbai | Updated On:

Members of the bar association in Chennai are staging a protest outside the Madras High Court. This is in support of Madras HC Chief Justice Vijaya K Tahilramani who resigned days after the Supreme Court collegium declined her request for reconsideration of transfer to Meghalaya. 

READ I JP Nadda on Jethmalani: He was a legend of bar and inspired lawyers

Collegium's arbitrary decision?

The collegium, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi had recommended the transfer of justice Tahilramani who was elevated as the Madras HC chief justice on August 8 last year. On August 28, 2019, the collegium decided to transfer her to Meghalaya High Court. On September 3, she requested the SC collegium to reconsider the transfer decision which was eventually turned down after which she sent in her resignation.

The left has jumped in this controversy calling the move by the SC shocking and disturbing. CPIM has said that the treatment meted out to Ramyani is insulting and humiliating to the women of this country. 

READ I Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case: Madras HC refuses to direct Tamil Nadu Governor to consider state govt's resolution to release the 7 life-convicts

Protest by the Bar

The bar association members and also the advocates association of the Madras HC are protesting outside the Madras HC supporting Romani and are also protesting against the collegium, stating that the transfer order is not legal. 

Raj Shekar, advocate in the Madras HC stated, "The collegium has taken a decision against the wish of the majority. The whole of state of Tamil Nadu, the lawyers fraternity and we the people and we the lawyers of Tamil Nadu and the Madra bar and Madra High Court advocates association and women lawyer's association, everybody is united we are standing behind the Chief Justice's transfer because it is arbitrary, it is against the wish and she has done only good to the state and high court. She was an honest Chief Justice. She was doing her job meticulously, without any fear or favour. She was one of the best Chief justice's the Madras HC has ever seen."

READ I Madras High Court pulls up Tamil Nadu government over increase in cases of honour killings, demands immediate action

A lawyer protesting added, "There is no reason to transfer her as there has been no complaint against her. There have been no complains of corruption, even suspicion of corruption."

Senior lawyer Abha Singh said, "She (Romani) is an outstanding judge of high integrity and the way she has been deported has filled all of us with anger and we are very disappointed with the government that rather than appreciating her work, rather than bringing her to bombay they are sending her to Meghalaya which is very unfair."

READ I Kamal Haasan gets anticipatory bail from Madras High Court over 'India's first terrorist was Hindu' comment citing Nathuram Godse

The advocates through the incident impressed upon the need for transparency in the system. Since there is no parliamentary legislation governing the transfer of judges, the power is often exercised arbitrarily and there have been precedents in which the decision of the collegium was reversed. According to the advocates, due to Romani's bold step, she has introduced an impetus, encouraging implementation of a transparent system in the collegium.

In order to display their protest, the advocates are planning to conduct a statewide boycott on September 10. They demand that the CJI advise the collegium to reverse the order and to restore Justice Tahilramani back to her original post. They also request the Hon'ble President of India to not accept her resignation in the larger interests of judiciary. 

READ I Section 377 triumph's lawyers Menaka Guruswamy & Arundhati Katju confirm they're a couple, say SC verdict wasn't just a professional but a personal win too

Published:
By 2030, 40% Indian will not have access to drinking water
SAVE WATER NOW
PEOPLE HAVE PLEDGED SO FAR
DO NOT MISS