On the basis of the Supreme Court's landmark verdict on the Ayodhya land dispute, Leader of the opposition in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, MK Stalin tweeted in Tamil that, "I hope that they will carry it (the verdict) out cautiously and without any prejudice." Stalin in the tweet further stated, "the Supreme Court's Ayodhya Verdict is delivered and it should be followed but with respect to the religious sentiments and without any damage to the country's diversity."
MK Stalin had further attached a statement in the tweet, where he further stated in Tamil, "The Supreme Court of India has found a solution to the long-standing issue of the Ayodhya title dispute." Stalin added, "I am sure that after the Supreme Court's constitutional ruling, all parties will be treated with equal thought and caution." He reiterated "without any prejudice and without any damage to the country's diversity."
உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தின் அரசியல் சட்ட அமர்வே #AYODHYAVERDICT வழங்கியதற்குப் பிறகு, அதை எந்தவித விருப்பு-வெறுப்புக்கும் உட்படுத்தாமல், மதநல்லிணக்கம் போற்றி, நாட்டின் பன்முகத்தன்மைக்கு எவ்விதச் சேதாரமும் ஏற்பட்டுவிடாமல் எச்சரிக்கை உணர்வுடன் முன்னெடுத்துச் செல்வார்கள் என்று நம்புகிறேன். pic.twitter.com/AeVa8gh9oG— M.K.Stalin (@mkstalin) November 9, 2019
Pronouncing the landmark verdict in the Ayodhya dispute case, the Supreme Court on Saturday delivered a unanimous judgment in the title suit of the disputed area awarding it to the Hindu parties for the construction of a temple. It also directed the Centre to come up with a scheme within three months to set up a trust which will hand over the outer courtyard and inner courtyard of the site for construction of a temple. Apart from this, the SC stated that an alternate land of 5 acres is to be allotted to Muslims either by the central govt or the State govt, in a suitable and prominent place in Ayodhya. CJI Ranjan Gogoi, while delivering the unanimous judgment, dismissed the claims of the Sunni Central Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara. He also termed that the three-way division of the disputed land by the Allahabad HC in its 2010 verdict is wrong.