Advertisement

Updated October 1st, 2018 at 19:56 IST

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines To Deter Vandalism In Name Of Protest

The Supreme Court on Monday issued guidelines to deter acts of vandalism and hooliganism carried out in the name of public protests. The PIL was filed at the time of the release of Sanjay Leela Bhansali's 'Padmaavat' when the Karni Sena launched nationwide protests.

| Image:self
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday issued guidelines to deter acts of vandalism and hooliganism carried out in the name of public protests. The Apex Court passed the ruling while hearing a plea filed by Kodungallur Film Society, which had sought framing of guidelines in this regard.

READ: Sabarimala Verdict | Justice Indu Malhotra, The Only Woman Judge In Supreme Court’s 5 Judge Bench, Offers Dissenting Opinion On Women’s Entry To Sabarimala Temple

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in this regard was filed at the time of the release of director Sanjay Leela Bhansali's magnum opus Padmaavat, when Rajput groups, including the Karni Sena, had launched nationwide protests and resorted to vandalism, alleging that the Ranveer Singh, Deepika Padukone starrer showed queen Padmavati in bad light .

Earlier, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, also comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud had termed the incidents of vandalism of private and public properties by various groups during protests across the country as "grave".

READ: After Padmaavat And Manikarnika: The Queen Of Jhansi, Protests Now Begin In Rajasthan To Stop Anurag Kashyap's Manmarziyaan

The top court had observed that it will issue detailed guidelines for curbing such acts carried out by mobs in the name of protests. Attorney General KK Venugopal had lashed out at the police for failing to take stringent action against those who caused loss by destroying private and public property.

"Responsibility should be fixed on authorities like the Superintendent of Police of the area, in cases of vandalism and rioting," Venugopal had told the court. The Kodungallur Film Society approached the court seeking implementation of the guidelines framed by the top court in 2009 in one of its judgments.

In the 2009 judgment, the top court had issued a slew of directions and ordered that the organizers of any protests shall be personally held accountable for the loss of private and public property in the protest. Police authorities were asked to video graph such protests so that accountability could be fixed.

READ: URBAN NAXAL CASE | After Supreme Court Refuses Relief To Arrested ‘Urban Naxals’, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Says Pseudo Liberals ‘Conspire Against The Nation, But Want The Nation To Be Liberal Against Them’

Advertisement

Published October 1st, 2018 at 18:24 IST

Your Voice. Now Direct.

Send us your views, we’ll publish them. This section is moderated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Quicks

Pooja Vastrakar
8 minutes ago
RCB vs KKR
11 minutes ago
Big Communication Gap Within the Congress: Sanjay Nirupam Targets Party Leadership | EXCLUSIVE
17 minutes ago
Xiaomi SU7 launch
18 minutes ago
Apple Watch
19 minutes ago
Zomato delivery boy in tears over blocked account
32 minutes ago
Delhi: Man Arrested For Killing A Man During Pub Fight In Pitampura Bar
32 minutes ago
Congress Press Conference
33 minutes ago
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whatsapp logo