Cricket News

Team India Briefed On Anti-concussion Helmets After Steve Smith's Blow

Written By Press Trust Of India | Mumbai | Published:

Hack:

  • The BCCI had asked its players to speak to their respective helmet suppliers to design a more protective headgear
  • However, some of the former and current Indian players feel that it cannot be made mandatory based on Smith's technique only.
  • Former India 'keeper Deep Dasgupta spoke on how each player preferred a different helmet.

The BCCI has briefed its players on the importance of wearing an anti-concussion helmet but left the decision to use neck guard on the cricketers despite growing calls to make it mandatory. Compulsory neck guards on helmets for Australian cricketers are "not far away", the national team's sports medicine chief said on Monday after Jofra Archer a snorter felled Steve Smith during the second Ashes Test.

BCCI briefs captain and coach about the significance of neck guards

While an anti-concussion helmet is still not mandatory but the ICC's cricket committee has extensively deliberated on the issue and came out with concussion substitute -- a change in the rule that has been welcomed by all and one that Australia effectively used it in the form of Marnus Labuschagne in the second Ashes Test.

"Once the new rules on concussions came into effect, the BCCI briefed the captain as well as the coaching staff about it. We have told them about helmets with anti-concussion element -- neck guards. A few players including Shikhar Dhawan use it but we can't force them. A helmet is also about a matter of comfort," a senior BCCI official, privy to the development, told PTI.

READ | Virat Kohli, Team India flaunt new number jerseys before Windies test

The official informed that after the Phill Hughes tragedy, the BCCI had asked its players to speak to their respective helmet suppliers to design a more protective headgear.

"But the helmet is something that a player should be comfortable with. Some players may find it difficult to maneuver or feel a bit discomfort around the neck region. Till ICC doesn't make it mandatory, I believe we should leave it up to the players," he said.

"I think it (helmets with neck guards) should be (mandatory)," Peter Brukner, a former doctor of the Australian cricket team from 2012-2017, told The Australian newspaper.

READ | Brian Lara feels that West Indies players can work on mental aspect

Former cricketers say batsman's stance matters

However, some of the former and current Indian players feel that it cannot be made mandatory based on Smith's technique only.

"I would always listen to what Sunil Gavaskar has to say with regards to playing short balls. Watch the ball till last moment. But the odd delivery will hit you. It's all about the technique. Look at the bowlers of yesteryears. Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall, Imran Khan and in our time Shoaib Akhtar, Brett Lee. They were all quick," said senior off-spinner Harbhajan Singh.

"You can't tell a youngster to copy Steve Smith's technique. It's very unique and very effective. But for him only. Also every team doesn't have a Jofra Archer-like bowler. It could be against a team with medium pacers on Feroz Shah Kotla. Why do you need a neck guard there," Harbhajan asked.

READ | India Vs West Indies: Ravindra Jadeja on the verge of a new milestone

Different players, different helmets

Former India 'keeper Deep Dasgupta spoke on how each player preferred a different helmet.

"Sachin Tendulkar used to wear 'Forma' helmets and Virat (Kohli) does the same. Rahul (Dravid) used to wear CMD while a lot of players use 'Masuri' helmets.

"I can tell you when I used CMD, I would have some discomfort near my neck region as the side grill of the visor would graze it. But Masuri had a wider base and I felt comfortable. So it's an individual choice," Dasgupta said

READ | Ashes 2019: Australia rule out bouncer battle despite Smith blow

DO NOT MISS