Advertisement

Updated May 26th, 2020 at 22:57 IST

2nd case challenging 2020 census preparation dismissed

For the second time this spring, a federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing the U.S. Census Bureau of not devoting enough manpower and offices on the ground to have a successful count of every resident in the U.S. during the 2020 census.

| Image:self
Advertisement

For the second time this spring, a federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing the U.S. Census Bureau of not devoting enough manpower and offices on the ground to have a successful count of every resident in the U.S. during the 2020 census.

The federal judge in Maryland last month dismissed the lawsuit brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and Prince George’s County, a majority African American county in Maryland.

The NAACP and the county had demanded that the agency send more workers into the field and spend more money on encouraging people to participate in the once-a-decade head count, calling the Census Bureau’s preparations deficient compared with the number of hires and field offices it had in the previous census in 2010. The lawsuit faulted the bureau for conducting limited testing for the 2020 census, particularly when, for the first time, it is encouraging most respondents to answer the questionnaire online. The bureau’s deficient preparations could result in an undercount, according to the lawsuit.

In his decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Grimm said it was “of limited value” to compare preparations for the 2020 census with the 2010 census, which relied on a majority of residents responding by paper questionnaires. The Census Bureau hasn’t refused to spend money on preparations, but it has spent money in a different way because of the change from a reliance on paper questionnaires to online responses, said the judge, noting that the bureau had wide discretion in planning the census.

“Comparing the two is like comparing dogs to cats — superficial similarities, but fundamental differences at the core,” Grimm wrote in his decision.

In March, a separate federal judge in New York tossed out a lawsuit from an advocacy group and a small New York city that argued the Census Bureau wasn’t devoting enough resources to the 2020 count.

The 2020 census will help determine the distribution of $1.5 trillion in federal spending and how many congressional seats each state gets.

An earlier version of the Maryland lawsuit was first filed in 2018, but it was dismissed by the district court. An appellate court later ruled some of the claims could be raised again in an amended complaint. Grimm left the door open for the NAACP and the county to file another amended complaint once the census results are made public.

(image credit: AP)

Advertisement

Published May 26th, 2020 at 22:57 IST

Your Voice. Now Direct.

Send us your views, we’ll publish them. This section is moderated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Quicks

India emerges as hotspot for global equity capital markets
a few seconds ago
Supriya Shrinate clarification
3 minutes ago
Judiciary Under Threat: Lawyers' Group Express Concern, Says 'Special Lobby Undermining Courts'
10 minutes ago
Exam Results
12 minutes ago
Islamic State has released a photoset, this time from Pakistan
13 minutes ago
Delhi Finance Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj
13 minutes ago
Sunita Kejriwal
14 minutes ago
Abhishek Sharma
20 minutes ago
Chinese economy
24 minutes ago
Tips to travel with toddlers
33 minutes ago
Dollar
40 minutes ago
Government bonds
42 minutes ago
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whatsapp logo