Updated April 5th, 2020 at 12:18 IST

Judges deny California inmate release request, cite US law

The special panel said it had no authority in this case because it was convened 13 years ago to consider a different issue: whether general overcrowding was causing inhumane conditions.

| Image:self
Advertisement

Federal judges on Saturday refused on procedural grounds to order California to free thousands of prisoners to ease crowded conditions that attorneys representing inmates likened to a “tinderbox” ready to ignite with the rapid spread of the coronavirus.

But the three judges invited inmates’ attorneys to file a new motion with either or both of two individual judges who oversee major class action lawsuits over inmate medical and mental health care. Both judges are members of the three-judge panel, which also includes a federal appellate judge.

The special panel said it had no authority in this case because it was convened 13 years ago to consider a different issue: whether general overcrowding was causing inhumane conditions.

“We take no satisfaction in turning away Plaintiffs’ motion without reaching the important question of whether Defendants have implemented constitutionally adequate measures to protect the inmates of California’s prisons from the serious threat posed by this unparalleled pandemic,” the judges concluded. “But we are bound by (federal law) to reach this conclusion.”

Don Specter, one of the attorneys representing inmates, said they “will be refiling the motion before the single district court judges as soon as possible.”

State officials did not immediately comment.

Gov, Gavin Newsom’s administration already temporarily blocked the transfers of new inmates into prisons and ordered the early release within days of nonviolent inmates who had been scheduled for parole within the next two months. Those moves are expected to lower the population by as many as 6,500 inmates within 30 days.

“We are taking extraordinary steps to address it, and there is no evidence that we have been indifferent,” attorney Paul Mello said. He argued during a 90-minute emergency teleconference Thursday that the court has no authority under federal law to second-guess state officials, and the judges agreed in Saturday’s ruling.

Those steps are not enough to give inmates double-bunked in crowded dormitories the room they need to stay separated by at least six feet like the rest of the state’s population, said Specter, director of the nonprofit Prison Law Office. That means inmates will rapidly spread the coronavirus among themselves and, through prison employees, into the community at large, he argued.

“There is a desperate need to reduce the prison population because the level of overcrowding in our prisons is literally a matter of life and death,” Specter told the judges.

The coronavirus causes mild or moderate symptoms for most people, such as a fever and cough that clear up in two to three weeks. It can cause more severe illness, including pneumonia and death, for some, especially older adults and people with existing health problems.

Aside from freeing enough lower security offenders to clear space in dormitories, the inmates’ attorneys asked the judges to release each of the more than 5,000 inmates age 65 and up who have a place to go in the community, and those whose health conditions make them vulnerable to the respiratory illness.

State officials previously said they already are making “creative use” of gymnasiums and other open areas to separate inmates, as well as housing more in public and private lockups outside the prisons. They announced Friday that they are providing $8.7 million for counties that must house jail inmates blocked from transferring to state prisons, as well as to reimburse counties for supervising paroles released up to two months earlier than expected.

The judicial panel includes U.S. district judges Kimberly Mueller in Sacramento and Jon Tigar in Oakland, and U.S. Circuit Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Only such a three-judge panel can order inmate releases, under federal law. The judges’ predecessors did so a decade ago, ordering the state to dramatically reduce its prison population to improve living conditions.

But the individual judges could — and have — ordered lesser relief many times over the years.

.

Advertisement

Published April 5th, 2020 at 12:18 IST