Advertisement

Updated November 14th, 2019 at 11:41 IST

MASSIVE: Rafale review petitions dismissed by SC, court rejects 'roving & fishing inquiry'

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions in the Rafale case against its December 14, 2018 judgment upholding the 36 Rafale jets' deal.

Reported by: Aishwaria Sonavane
Rafale
| Image:self
Advertisement

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions in the Rafale case against its December 14, 2018 judgment upholding the 36 Rafale jets' deal, giving a clean chit to the Modi government. The review petitions asked for a review in the jet deal with French firm Dassault Aviation. The top court rejected the plea that there was a necessity for registration of an FIR in connection with the Rafale deal. 

The five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S K Kaul, and K M Joseph pronounced the contentious judgment. Justice Kaul, pronouncing the judgment said that the Court found "no merit" in the review petition. The Supreme Court further said, "This Court did not think it appropriate to embark on the roving and fishing inquiry."

In May 2019, a three-judge bench had reserved verdict in the petition seeking review of the earlier December 14 judgment on the government-to-government deal to procure 36 Rafale aircraft. 

READ| Supreme Court LIVE updates: Verdicts in Sabarimala, Rafale reviews to be pronounced

Rafale hearing

The Supreme Court had looked into three aspects of the deal - the decision-making process, the pricing and the choice of the Indian offset partner. It had found no occasion to doubt the decision-making process and said it didn't find anything wrong in the selection of Indian offset partner by manufacturer Dassault. On the third criterion, it had said it wasn't its job to go into the pricing aspects.

However, an error was pointed out in the judgment regarding the pricing details following which the Centre filed a correction application. This had to do with the Supreme Court relying on the Central government's assertion - contained in a sealed cover - that the pricing details had been shared with the CAG and the report by the government's auditor had been placed before the Parliament's Public Accounts Committee.

However, the CAG report hadn't yet been placed before the PAC at the time that the case was being heard. Even as the Centre sought a correction over what was cited as a misinterpretation of language used in the sealed cover, former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan had sought a re-examination of the SC's findings.

READ| On meditation abroad, Rahul Gandhi makes WhatsApp breach about Rafale

Advertisement

Published November 14th, 2019 at 10:59 IST

Your Voice. Now Direct.

Send us your views, we’ll publish them. This section is moderated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Quicks

Indian Navy Rescues Hijacked MV Ruen
9 minutes ago
NDA Parties Seek EC Action Against DGP For Chaos At PM Modi's Andhra Pradesh Rally
9 minutes ago
tejashwi yadav, Rahul gandhi
10 minutes ago
Kerala Lottery Result Today
19 minutes ago
Suriya
29 minutes ago
Seal escapes at the last second by jumping on a boat
32 minutes ago
Cash Rs 1 crore seized in Karnataka's Mandya
32 minutes ago
Bengaluru Police Seize ₹20 Lakh Unaccounted Cash In Two Separate Incidents
36 minutes ago
Stock market news
37 minutes ago
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whatsapp logo