Last Updated:

Delhi HC Refuses Interim Bail To Man Accused Of Shooting Guard & Looting Rs 1.5 Crore

Delhi High Court has refused to grant interim bail to a man who is accused of looting an amount of Rs 1.5 crore & shooting a cash transportation vehicle guard

Delhi

The Delhi High Court has declined to grant interim bail to a man who is accused of looting an amount of Rs 1.5 crore and shooting a cash transportation vehicle guard outside an ATM in Delhi in 2014. While dismissing the interim bail plea of Rizwan Iqbal on Wednesday, a bench of Justice Brijesh Sethi observed that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature.

The court in its order said that "there are allegations against the petitioner in the instant FIR that he along with his co-accused had looted an amount of Rs 1.5 crores and shot the guard of the cash van outside City Bank ATM at Kamla Nagar, Delhi".

READ | Delhi health min says over 400 healthcare workers have tested Covid positive till date

"However, without commenting on the merits of the case, this court finds that the petitioner's father had not tested positive for COVID-19 but was precautionarily quarantined. At present, he is stated to be suffering from asthma and is taking treatment at home and is not hospitalised. Petitioner has a 26-year-old brother, who can also take care of his father. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this court finds no grounds to grant interim bail," it added, detailing the plea's grounds.

READ | Confident of Nepal playing in top-flight soon: Delhi Capitals' Lamichhane

The petitioner had earlier approached the High Court seeking interim bail for 45 days on the grounds that he had to take care of his ill father, who recently came out of quarantine because he was suspected of suffering from COVID-19 and is an asthmatic patient.

Advocate Amjad Khan, counsel for the petitioner, told the court that the earlier bail application of petitioner was rejected by this court on April 9, 2020. The bail application specifically mentioned that petitioner's father was already quarantined for seven days and after passing of next seven days, there may be a change of circumstances, and, that now since the report of petitioner's father is negative, he needs interim bail to take care of his ailing father aged 65 years and to meet the financial needs of the family by taking over his father's business of selling fruits and vegetables.

READ | Spl train reaches Bengaluru from Delhi, passengers to undergo 14-day quarantine

Khan further mentioned that the petitioner was released on interim bail by a trial court for three days on March 26, 2018, to attend his sister's marriage and that he had surrendered on time and that there is no likelihood of petitioner fleeing if he is released on interim bail. 

However, Additional Public Prosecutor advocate Panna Lal Sharma, on the other hand, opposed the interim bail application on the ground that similar application of petitioner was rejected by this court on April 9, 2020. 

Iqbal has been in custody since November 30, 2017, in the case filed under Sections 392 (robbery), 411 (dishonestly receiving stolen property), 413 (habitually dealing in stolen property), 414 (assisting in the concealment of stolen property), 506 (criminal intimidation), 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

READ | Vande Bharat Mission: 244 Indian expats from Washington DC depart for Delhi

(With inputs from agency)

First Published:
By 2030, 40% Indians will not have access to drinking water
SAVE WATER NOW
PEOPLE HAVE PLEDGED SO FAR