Advertisement

Updated June 1st, 2020 at 16:20 IST

Delhi HC seeks Centre, NCLT acting prez response on plea challenging transfer orders

Delhi HC on Monday sought response of the Centre and NCLT acting president on a plea by its member (judicial) challenging the transfer orders issued in April and May.

| Image:self
Advertisement

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought response of the Centre and National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT) acting president on a plea by its member (judicial) challenging the transfer orders issued in April and May.

Justice V Kameswar Rao, who conducted the hearing through video conferencing, issued notice and asked the Centre, through ministries of Corporate Affairs and Law and Justice, NCLT acting president and its registrar to file their counter affidavits on the petition.

The court listed the matter for further hearing on June 12. The plea filed by Rajasekhar VK, member (judicial) has sought to set aside the order transferring him from NCLT Mumbai to Kolkata bench.

He has also challenged two other orders by which the NCLT acting president BSV Prakash Kumar has transferred himself from NCLT Chennai to Mumbai bench and the transfer of eight other members, contending that the orders are illegal.

The acting president by April 30 and May 12 orders, had shuffled the posting of the NCLT members. The petition, filed through advocate Vandana Sehgal, also sought a direction to appoint an eligible member as the acting president, in place of Kumar.

Rajasekhar was appointed NCLT member (judicial) on May 3, 2019 and was posted to the Mumbai bench.

The plea has sought a status quo in respect of postings of members of NCLT till the time a regular president is not appointed and that the president or acting president of the tribunal shall remain at the principal seat, that is Delhi, in terms of the statutory provisions.

The plea said Kumar has only worked as a district judge and as a member of Company Law Board before being a member of the NCLT and since he was not a high court judge, he was not eligible to be appointed as president, particularly, when Justice Rajesh Dayal Khare, a retired high court judge, was available and functioning as member (judicial) at NCLT, Allahabad bench.

“As acting president, Kumar cannot ask for a transfer, nor can he be transferred to any place, as he has to remain at the principal bench at New Delhi so long as he is acting as president of the tribunal,” the petition contended.

The plea claimed that the transfer orders are in violation of statutory provisions and the rules and in the absence of any consultation or order passed by the Central Government's Ministry of Law and Justice, the orders of transfer of NCLT Members were illegal and contrary to the decisions of the Supreme Court.

It said the transfer orders were signed by the NCLT registrar who had no power to do so.

It added that there were no compelling circumstances for the issuance of the transfer orders when the NCLT was functioning without a president and the members could anyway not take charge of their designated places of postings until the lockdown was lifted by the government.

The petition has arrayed Centre, through ministries of Corporate Affairs and Law and Justice, NCLT acting president and its registrar as parties.

Advertisement

Published June 1st, 2020 at 16:20 IST

Your Voice. Now Direct.

Send us your views, we’ll publish them. This section is moderated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Quicks

Jailed Gangster Mukhtar Ansari Passes Away
16 minutes ago
Mukhtar Ansari Death
26 minutes ago
Chamkila
29 minutes ago
Lorry Crushes Car-Cleaner To Death In Telangana
34 minutes ago
Major League Cricket
35 minutes ago
Abhay Deol
35 minutes ago
delhi cm arvind kejriwal
37 minutes ago
MEA Responds To China’s Comment On Sikh Separatist Gurupatwant Singh Pannun
39 minutes ago
Riyan Parag
42 minutes ago
David Warner
43 minutes ago
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whatsapp logo