Nagpur Riots Debate With Arnab: Sedition Charges On ex-Lok Sabha Candidate Fahim Khan

Debate With Arnab: An example needs to be made of Fahim Khan. The city president of a small party called the Minorities Democratic Party.. which led the Nagpur riots. He is the leader of Aurangzeb fan club and he has tried to instigate Hindus by calling the fanatic, anti Hindu, genocidal Aurangzeb Alamgir Hazrat, Alamgir Hazrat, a term of great reverence, for a killer Mughal who massacred Hindus and Sikhs, destroyed Hindu temples and killed Guru Teg Bahadur for not converting to Islam and for vowing to defend Hindus. If a killer of Muslims had been spoken about with such reverence, would Muslim leaders and people like Fahim Khan be quiet. No, but of course they expect Hindus to suffer in silence. And when Hindus protest, democratically and peacefully, as the VHP and Bajrang Dal did, the secular lobby tries to equate the Muslim mob and its actions with that of the VHP. Did the VHP and Bajrang Dal burn vehicles and target and destroy shops of the Muslim Community, and carry out stonepelting injuring dozens of policemen and try to burn Nagpur down? NO. Did the Muslim mob do exactly that? Yes it did. But will scroll and wire call out a Muslim for for what it does? With the aggression it deserves. No neither will they do that, and neither will they run a campaign against the member of the Muslim mob who molested a female police officer on duty in the garb of defending Aurangzeb. That’s why a legal example needs to be made of Fahim Khan. The man appears to be a local goon who uses religious provocation to carry out organized violence against Hindus. Hindus must also unite. Hindus must use reason law and conviction and strength to respond with the law on their side. Just facing attacks and showing the other cheek is a Gandhian attitude that doesn’t help. Hindus must be united. And not let any random mob try and create a sense of fear. Fahim Khan and such Aurangzeb lovers will have to be put in their place