Advertisement

Updated September 24th, 2019 at 18:39 IST

Supreme Court restricts police's power over attachment of property

The Supreme Court has delivered a judgment, severely restricting the police's power over the attachment of immovable property during an investigation.

Reported by: Akriti Tyagi
Supreme Court
| Image:self
Advertisement

The Supreme Court of India has delivered a judgment, severely restricting the police's power over the attachment of immovable property during an investigation. The SC held that using the powers under section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the police cannot attach a person's immovable property during the investigation.

READ I Supreme Court pushes for framing UCC, cites Goa as 'Shining example'

Attachment of Immovable Property 

The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna. An appeal had been filed by the State of Maharashtra against November 29, 2010, Bombay High Court judgment in the case Sudhir Vasant Karnataki vs The State of Maharashtra. In the case, Justices R C Chavan and R S Dalvi of the Bombay HC held that police cannot seize immovable property. Aggrieved by the order of the HC, the State of Maharashtra filed an appeal which now the Supreme Court has dismissed. 

READ I Karti Chidambaram to not get his ₹10 crore deposit says Supreme Court

The state of Maharashtra argued that since the police possess the power to freeze bank accounts during an investigation, they can similarly attach properties as well. However, the Supreme Court has quashed the argument and has clarified that the police has the authority to freeze the moveable properties of the accused. 

READ I Criminal complaint against Shehla Rashid by Supreme Court lawyer over her 'baseless tweets', Tukde lies called out by Army

Section 102 of CrPC

Section 102 CrPC allows the police the power to seize certain property. The provision states:

"102. Power of police officer to seize certain property.

(1) Any police officer, may seize any property which may be alleged or suspected to have been stolen, or which may be found under circumstances which create suspicion of the commission of any offence.

(2) Such police officer, if subordinate to the officer in charge of a police station, shall forthwith report the seizure to that officer."

READ I Supreme Court agrees to hear plea against Triple Talaq criminalisation

READ I Supreme Court grants CBI 2 more weeks to complete probe in accident case involving Unnao rape survivor

Advertisement

Published September 24th, 2019 at 13:02 IST

Your Voice. Now Direct.

Send us your views, we’ll publish them. This section is moderated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Quicks

Patna Shuklla poster
a few seconds ago
Millet
2 minutes ago
RCB women's team and Virat Kohli
11 minutes ago
Congress Press Conference
11 minutes ago
IndiGo direct flight between Mumbai and Ayodhya
12 minutes ago
former dsp shailendra singh revealed criminal activity of Mukhtar Ansari
14 minutes ago
IBL Finance IPO
18 minutes ago
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell
22 minutes ago
RBI
33 minutes ago
TCS 'cash for jobs' scam
39 minutes ago
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whatsapp logo