Supreme Court Issues Notice To UP Govt On Plea Challenging Renaming Allahabad As Prayagraj

Law & Order

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government on a petition challenging the govt's decision taken in 2018 to rename Allahabad as Prayagraj

Written By Nalini Sharma | Mumbai | Updated On:
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday, January 20, issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government on a petition filed by the Allahabad Heritage Society along with citizens of Allahabad challenging the 2018 decision of the Uttar Pradesh government to rename Allahabad as Prayagraj.

The Allahabad High Court had in February last year dismissed the plea filed before it ordering that the State government was well within its powers to change the name of a district and that the Courts should not enter into policy decisions made by State governments.

A Special Leave Petition was then filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court decision and seeking the overturning of UP government’s decision of renaming the city.

READ | UP Cabinet Approves Renaming Of Faizabad As Ayodhya, Allahabad As Prayagraj

The petition before the SC states:

"The name Allahabad has been associated with the City for over 400 years. The name now is not merely the name of a place but has become inextricably linked with the identity of the city and all its people irrespective of their religion. It forms part of the day to day lived cultural experience of the residents of the city and the districts of Allahabad.”

The petition also further challenges the decision of the Allahabad High Court on the basis that a Court can enter into decisions of policy by a State government when it directly affects the fundamental rights of the citizens of the country.

READ | Allahabad HC Seeks Replies From UP Govt, AMU On Pleas Against Aligarh Protest Violence

The petition says no consultation was sought from the public by the UP government prior to arriving at the above decision. The plea states:

"The haste with which the process was followed is itself demonstrative of the fact that the State did not adequately consider the evidence on the record as well as the implication of the decision on the fundamental rights of the citizens residing and belong to Allahabad.”

Earlier, Justice Ashok Bhushan had escaped from hearing the petition, directing that it should be listed before another bench.

READ | SC Refuses To Stay Allahabad HC Verdict Annulling Election Of SP MP Azam Khan's Son As UP MLA

READ | Uttar Pradesh: Allahabad HC Issues Notice To Yogi Government Over Anti-CAA Violence

Published:
By 2030, 40% Indians will not have access to drinking water
SAVE WATER NOW
PEOPLE HAVE PLEDGED SO FAR
DO NOT MISS