Updated 25 February 2026 at 16:57 IST

With a Bogus Law Degree, Pakistani Judge Served the High Court for Half a Decade

A Pakistani judge served five years on the Islamabad High Court with a bogus law degree. The IHC’s 116‑page judgment declared his appointment a “legal nullity,” citing fraud, impersonation, and invalid academic records.

Follow : Google News Icon  
With a Bogus Law Degree, Pakistani Judge Served the High Court for Half a Decade
With a Bogus Law Degree, Pakistani Judge Served the High Court for Half a Decade | Image: X

New Delhi: The Islamabad High Court has issued a scathing 116‑page verdict against former judge Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, ruling that his appointment was “without lawful authority” because his law degree was invalid from the start.

A division bench led by Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Azam Khan found Jahangiri’s academic record riddled with fraud. University of Karachi documents revealed that he first sat for his LL.B. exams in 1988 using a fake enrolment number. After being caught cheating and banned for three years, he reappeared in 1990 under another student’s identity. Later, he attempted exams again with yet another enrolment number, something the university confirmed was impossible under its rules.

The court also noted that Jahangiri was never admitted to Government Islamia Law College, making his credentials even more suspect. On this basis, his degree was declared void ab initio invalid from the outset.

Court’s Criticism

The judgment highlighted Jahangiri’s conduct during proceedings. Despite repeated opportunities, he failed to present original documents or a written reply. Instead, he filed applications seeking adjournments, recusal of the chief justice, and constitution of a full court. The bench described these moves as “dilatory tactics” and rejected his plea for recusal, stressing that bench formation is the prerogative of the chief justice.

Advertisement

Legal Reasoning

The IHC clarified that questions about a judge’s qualifications are distinct from judicial acts protected under Article 199(5). It further ruled that the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) cannot validate an appointment that was void from inception, as its jurisdiction applies only to misconduct or incapacity during service.

Appeal Filed

The petition against Jahangiri’s degree was filed by lawyer Mian Dawood and declared maintainable in December 2025. Jahangiri has since challenged the ruling before the Federal Constitutional Court, arguing that the IHC acted with bias and undue haste. He claims the University of Karachi’s cancellation of his degree had been suspended by the Sindh High Court, and that disputed facts required a full trial.

Advertisement

For now, the Islamabad High Court’s judgment stands: a man who served five years on the bench has been stripped of legitimacy, his law degree declared fraudulent, and his appointment void from the very beginning.

Read More: Fear Grips Islamabad: Rattled Pakistan Counting Minutes as PM Modi Gives Armed Forces Free Hand To Avenge Pahalgam Massacre

Published By : Priya Pathak

Published On: 25 February 2026 at 16:57 IST