SC Dismisses Plea Challenging Delhi L-G's NSA Order; Says Can't Pass A General Direction

Law & Order

Supreme Court refused to hear petition challenging the Delhi Lieutenant Governor's notification of National Security Act (NSA) that empowered police

Written By Shubhayan Bhattacharya | Mumbai | Updated On:
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a petition challenging the Delhi Lieutenant Governor's notification of the National Security Act (NSA) that empowered Delhi police to detain people without trial for a period of 12 months. The apex court said it can't pass a general direction to restrain government from invoking NSA and granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition if the law is misused by authorities. The petition was filed by Advocate ML Sharma and heard by a bench of Justice J Arun Mishra and Justice Indira Banerjee.

READ | Home Ministry Approaches Supreme Court For Modification Of Death Penalty Guidelines

In light of mass agitation, Delhi uses NSA

Delhi L-G Anil Baijal on January 10 extended detaining powers to Delhi Police under the NSA for a three-month period starting January 19. The national capital has been rocked by massive agitation for over a month against the contentious CAA, proposed NRC and student discontent over university-related issues. Violence was reported in campuses of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Jamia Millia Islamia University while sit-in protests carried on in places like Shaheen Bagh.

READ | Delhi L-G Anil Baijal Meets Shaheen Bagh Protesters, Urges Them To Call Off Agitation

Plea challenges 'unconstitutional' NSA notification

Advocate ML Sharma made the Ministry of Home Affairs and the governments of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Manipur parties to the plea. The petition has termed the notification by Delhi L-G, allowing police to invoke NSA to detain persons, as "unconstitutional" and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (freedom of speech and expression) and 21 (right to life) of the Constitution.

"The cause of actions arose on 10 January, when respondents (states) imposed NSA Act for next three months with effect from January 19 in Delhi as well as in Andhra Pradesh by the state government to arrest and detain...for protests against a person holding office of the prime minister and ministers in the Central government...," the plea said. ML Sharma had sought a direction from the SC to quash the notification.

READ | Airtel, Voda Idea To Pay AGR Dues After Supreme Court Hearing, Jio To Pay Rs 177 Cr

What is NSA?

The National Security Act of 1980 is a stringent law that allows "preventive detention" for months if authorities are satisfied that an individual is a threat to national security or law and order. Under the NSA, a person needs not to be charged during period of detention. The detained person can appeal before a high court advisory board but they are not allowed a lawyer during the trial.

(With Inputs from PTI)

READ | Tata Vs Mistry: SC Stays NCLAT's Dismissal Of RoC Plea Seeking Modification In Its Order

First Published:
By 2030, 40% Indians will not have access to drinking water
SAVE WATER NOW
PEOPLE HAVE PLEDGED SO FAR
DO NOT MISS