UGC’s New 2026 Rules Spark Nationwide Backlash: What Is The Controversy? Here’s All You Must Know

New Delhi: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on January 13, 2026 notified a fresh set of rules titled the “Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026”, aimed at strengthening safeguards against discrimination in colleges and universities across India.  However, the move has triggered widespread debate and protests by, sections of students, teachers and civil society groups raising objections against the regulations, absence of a provision to penalize false complaints and concerns about imbalanced grievance handling.

What the New UGC Rules Say

The 2026 regulations replace the UGC’s earlier anti-discrimination framework from 2012. The stated objective is to formalise and enforce measures that prevent discrimination based on caste, religion, gender, disability, place of birth and other grounds in higher education institutions (HEIs).

Key provisions include:

• Mandatory setting up of Equal Opportunity Cells (EOCs) in all universities and colleges.
• Formation of Equity Committees to examine complaints and monitor compliance.
• Establishment of 24/7 helplines and Equity Squads for grievance reporting.
• Compulsory awareness programmes and periodic reporting to the UGC.

HEIs that fail to comply could face regulatory actions, including suspension of recognition, withdrawal of funding or restrictions on programmes. The UGC has stated that the regulations are intended to create a structured framework to prevent discrimination and ensure accountability within higher education institutions.

Concerns Raised Over the Regulations

Concerns surrounding the new rules were raised by stakeholders regarding committee composition, procedural safeguards and scope of enforcement.

One of the key issues flagged relates to the composition of Equity Committees, which, as per the regulations, must include representatives from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), persons with disabilities and women. The rules do not specify mandatory representation for students from the unreserved category, an omission that has been cited in protests and legal challenges.

Another issue raised pertains to procedural safeguards. Stakeholders have noted that the final notified version does not include explicit provisions addressing false or malicious complaints, which were mentioned in earlier drafts. This has led to concerns about complaint handling processes and due procedure.

Additionally, critics have pointed to broad definitions of discrimination and expanded monitoring powers under the regulations, arguing that clarity on interpretation and implementation is required.

Why UGC Is Trending

The hashtag #ShameOnUGC began trending as students and social media users protested what they describe as uneven implementation and lack of wider consultation before notification of the rules. Campus-level protests have been reported in parts of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar, while several political workers and student leaders have resigned from party posts in protest against the regulations.

Critics have pointed to the composition of Equity Committees, noting that the rules do not mandate representation from students of the general category, raising concerns about imbalanced grievance handling.

Opposition has also focused on the absence of a provision to penalise false or malicious complaints in the final notified version, which some stakeholders say could lead to unverified allegations triggering formal inquiries.

The definitions of terms like “discrimination” used in the regulations have been described by some, as broad or vague, leading to uncertainty over what conduct could fall under the rules. Legal action has also followed: a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging aspects of the regulations was filed in the Supreme Court of India, with petitioners seeking review or suspension of the notification.

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the new rules has also been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking judicial review.

Protests and resignations have occurred in several states. Students and civil society groups have mounted both online and campus-level demonstrations, while some political party office-bearers in Uttar Pradesh have reportedly resigned in opposition to the regulations.

UGC’s Stand

The UGC has cited official data indicating a rise in reported cases of caste-based discrimination in higher education over the past few years, noting that reported cases rose more than 100% between 2019-20 and 2023-24. Officials have maintained that the intent of the regulations is preventive and corrective, not punitive.

Government sources have stated that feedback and representations from stakeholders are being examined and that the regulations are aimed at ensuring safer and more equitable campuses.

ALSO READ: 'Terrorism Can Never Be Normalised': Indian Envoy Blasts Pakistan At UNSC, Reaffirms J&K As 'Inalienable'