Updated 25 February 2026 at 14:22 IST

Epstein Files Reveal Missing FBI Records: Allegations Against Trump Documented, But Key Pages Withheld

New revelations in the Epstein files show that allegations against Donald Trump were documented by the FBI, but dozens of interview records remain missing. The gaps raise serious questions about DOJ transparency and accountability.

Follow :  
×

Share


Epstein Files Reveal Missing FBI Records: Allegations Against Trump Documented, But Key Pages Withheld | Image: X

New Delhi: The revelations in the disgraced Jeffrey Epstein case grow darker with each passing day. Big names are entangled, allegations continue to surface, and protests over transparency are mounting. Now, newly uncovered details show that while allegations against Donald Trump were documented inside FBI and DOJ files, key records remain missing from the public release.

Allegations Documented

DOJ

 

Internal DOJ briefings and FBI interview notes confirm that at least one accuser directly spoke with investigators about Trump. The accuser alleged sexual assault in the 1980s, describing violence after resisting him. Another claim, considered credible by prosecutors, came from a government witness whose testimony helped convict Ghislaine Maxwell. That witness said Epstein introduced a 14‑year‑old girl to Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago in 1994. These accounts were serious enough to be included in DOJ presentations, suggesting investigators considered them credible.

Records Missing

DOJ
DOJ

Despite laws requiring the release of Epstein-related files, more than 50 pages of FBI interviews and notes tied to the Trump accuser are absent from the public database. One independent journalist and two media organisations in their independent reviews found discrepancies: documents catalogued internally by the DOJ do not appear online, and some files mentioning Trump were temporarily removed before being restored. These reviews highlight that several “302” interview summaries that are basic investigative memos are missing. Survivors have voiced frustration, saying their own statements are absent from the millions of pages released.

Conflicting Narratives

The White House has consistently dismissed allegations against Trump as false. DOJ officials have said missing files are either duplicates, privileged, or tied to ongoing investigations. Yet congressional oversight members, after reviewing unredacted logs, have accused the DOJ of illegally withholding survivor interviews. This contradiction between official denials and documented evidence gaps has fueled public suspicion.

Context and Impact

It is important to note: Trump has not been convicted of any crime in connection with Epstein. What is publicly available are allegations documented in FBI and DOJ files, some corroborated by credible witnesses. What is missing are dozens of interview pages and notes that could clarify how the government handled those claims.

The absence of these records has become a central issue, with lawmakers, journalists, and survivors pressing for answers. The controversy underscores the tension between protecting victim privacy, safeguarding ongoing investigations, and ensuring transparency when allegations involve powerful figures.

Read More: Former Norwegian Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland Attempts Suicide After Epstein Links Exposed, Hospitalised

Published By : Priya Pathak

Published On: 25 February 2026 at 14:19 IST