Madras HC Dismisses Puduherry CM's Plea Against Governor Kiran Bedi's Decision

Law & Order

The Judge also stated that the Governor should make efforts to solve the matter with the respected authorities before making a reference to the President.

Written By Devarshi mankad | Mumbai | Updated On:
Madras

Madras High Court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by the Chief Minister of Puducherry V Narayanasamy against Governor Kiran Bedi which challenged the latter's decision to distribute cash instead of free rice to ration cardholders. 

READ: HC Reserves Order On Puducherry Minister's Plea Over Appointment Of SEC

HC dismisses the petition 

Narayanaswamy had stated that on June 7, 2019, the government had passed a resolution which required to continue welfare schemes to provide items and later referred the scheme to the Union Home Ministry. The Home Ministry, in turn, directed the government to continue the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme.

Justice C V Karthikeyan stated that as per the Union Territory Act, the decision of the President is binding on the administrator and Ministers. He stated, “When a decision has been rendered by the President, then further actions must only be according to the decision given by the President. This is binding on the Council of Ministers, which includes the Chief Minister, and also the Lieutenant Governor. All who have taken an oath to abide by the provisions of the Constitution are bound by it. It is not for this court to call for explanations from the Ministry of Home Affairs as to what were the supervening circumstances which prevailed upon the President to give a decision that the Direct Benefit Transfer (cash) scheme must be preferred in lieu of distribution of free rice. The immunity guaranteed under the Constitution is sacrosanct."

READ: Madras HC Bans Blockade Of TN Assembly, Political Parties Divided Over Decision

Reacting to the verdict, Narayanawamy told a meeting of the PCC executive that "it is a day of grief" for him, while Bedi welcomed it, saying the scheme 'will check all possible leakages and pilferages.'

The Judge also stated that the Governor should make efforts to solve the matter with the respected authorities before making a reference to the President. He observed that in this case, the Governor had made no such efforts to arrive at an amicable solution. 

READ: Puducherry Minister To File A Case Against LG Bedi For Her 'habit' Of 'creating Hurdles'

READ: Madras HC Refuses To Hear Plea Seeking Ban On Anti-CAA Protests In Chennai On February 19

(with inputs from agencies)

First Published:
By 2030, 40% Indians will not have access to drinking water
SAVE WATER NOW
PEOPLE HAVE PLEDGED SO FAR
DO NOT MISS