Tejashwi Dares Bihar CM Nitish To 'breathalyze' His Leaders After DGP & Manjhi's Remarks

General News

RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday challenged Bihar CM Nitish Kumar to do a breathalyzer test of his leaders & bureaucrats over the alcohol ban in the state

Written By Manjiri Chitre | Mumbai | Updated On:
Tejashwi Yadav

RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday challenged Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar to conduct a breathalyzer test on his "leaders" and "bureaucrats" over the issue of the alcohol ban. The RJD leader took to Twitter and asked the Chief Minister to accept failure. 

Tejashwi's statements come after Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) leader Jitan Ram Manjhi reportedly demanded a lift on the alcohol ban in the state, after a top police official essentially said liquor was still flowing freely and the cops knew about it. 

Jitan Ram Manjhi's statement over alcohol ban

In a controversial statement, Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) president Jitan Ram Manjhi said that liquor should be consumed as medicine and hence, should not be banned. Coming in support, JDU MLA Shyam Bahadur Singh on Wednesday said, "What he has said is not wrong. I will not disagree with him. Liquor should be consumed according to a system and culture."

Read: 'No hope for people, youth betrayed': Akhilesh Yadav slams Yogi govt over UP Budget

Read: Congress adds 'warrior Rahul Gandhi' to Bihar poster war mix; joins RJD-JD(U) fight

The fiasco over the liquor ban was triggered after the Director General of Police in Bihar gave out stern statements on its sale in the state. The top police official had said that every constable and commissioner knows who sells or drinks alcohol in the area. However, he had said that if the police personnel does not know, then he is not "worthy" of holding the position in charge. The top Bihar police official had further said that without the knowledge of the station officer, even a leaf cannot flutter, let alone selling of alcohol.

Liquor Ban in Bihar

The liquor ban in Bihar was issued in the state on April 01, 2015, and the penalty for violating the law entails imprisonment for at least 5 to 10 years. But the recent amendment by the state government rules that the first-time offenders will not be sent to a mandatory prison term and a fine of Rs 50,000 will be charged instead. The Supreme Court upheld the state government’s decision on banning liquor in October 2016. The Supreme Court ruled that a ban on liquor is not equivalent to the fundamental rights of the people.  

Read: Prashant Kishor refuses to explain how he joined JD(U); adamant that Nitish Kumar lied

Read: Ashwini Choubey slams RJD's Berozgaari Hatao Yatra', calls Tejashwi 'unemployed'

First Published:
By 2030, 40% Indians will not have access to drinking water